Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Torin McCabe's avatar

>> I think this error of reasoning is another example of the deductivist fallacy

I call it the limits of analogical thinking. When Turkheimer says that "chopstick usage is +90% heritable" that is true. But how applicable is the analogy of chopsticks heritability or good vision heritability to intelligence heritability in modern America? We see lots of evidence for failure to increase IQ but and lots of evidence that people can be trained to use chopsticks and have their vision corrected. An analogy is only as good as its applicability.

Expand full comment
Joe Canimal's avatar

I'm saying that I wish real world institutions worked on the logic you propose, of requiring justifications for large spends and sprawling bureaucracies. Instead, large spends and sprawling bureaucracies create their own 'justification' through lobbying, entitlement effects, and the like.

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts