Review: Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics
www.emilkirkegaard.com
This book is written by one of the persons behind Skeptical Science, a website debunking pseudoscience in the area of climatology and global warning, very much like Talk Origins debunks evolution related pseudoscience. The book itself has more of a meta style and does not cover all arguments put forward by climate contrarians. After all, that is the purpose of the website. The book concerns itself primarily with exactly that which the title says: finding predictions made by contrarians, mainstream scientists (including IPCC) and examining how well they held up. I think I can rule out any surprises: the contrarians' predictions have not generally held up well, but the mainstream ones have.
Review: Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics
Review: Climatology Versus Pseudoscience…
Review: Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics
This book is written by one of the persons behind Skeptical Science, a website debunking pseudoscience in the area of climatology and global warning, very much like Talk Origins debunks evolution related pseudoscience. The book itself has more of a meta style and does not cover all arguments put forward by climate contrarians. After all, that is the purpose of the website. The book concerns itself primarily with exactly that which the title says: finding predictions made by contrarians, mainstream scientists (including IPCC) and examining how well they held up. I think I can rule out any surprises: the contrarians' predictions have not generally held up well, but the mainstream ones have.