Thank goodness my moral superiors are looking out for me via censorship, and vilifying science.
Here in the USA, because as a Hispanic, I'm too stupid to obtain the same Photo ID required to enter the 2024 DNC convention, thankfully no voter ID is required in many Democratic Party run states.
Ah, as a Hispanic, I'm also too shiftless, lazy, and financially irresponsible to save $30 USD once every 10 years to pay for a U.S. Passport Card. A Photo ID recognized across the USA.
The good news is that, AFAICT, the US election (and perhaps the UK budget) sucked almost all the attention away from this story. There seem to be very few other outlets reporting it according to Google, although the wikipedia page is the most visible hit
the avoidance of certain topic in science will always be with us I assume. bec it is not whether "they" disagree with doing the research (really), but "they" are very afraid of what that science may find. a little awkward to have to say "ok. darker skinned populations are x standard deviations less intelligent that lighter skinned populations. now what?" they actually strongly suspect the answers to these questions.
Folks like you are the true heirs to the dissident philosophers and proto-scientists upon whose shoulders we stand today. Gremlins like Harry Shukman and The Guardian trace their lineage back to medieval church inquisitors and witch-hunters.
I disagree I don't think the medieval church is bad as people claim I've studied them on in scholarship of it only about 4 to 10,000 people actually died by Inquisition and the actual death toll of the witch hunts was 50,000 and the Catholic church was pretty skeptical about which is existence saying that before the 14th century most the church scoundrel said they didn't exist or were just eluded women and yeah the church did preserve signs the Galileo fair is complicated because he couldn't prove a star parallax he Earth to move and the vision of Jupiter really didn't prove it because the tectonic system was around the idea that planets move around the Earth and the Earth doesn't move was the line with the best evidence at the time a better analogy with the left anti-science would be like Lysenkoism denying the fact that plants actually compete and that thinking led to the deaths about 7 million ukrainians in the name of equality of course how many atrocities has committed in that name is unknown
I am very open to your research, but the fear of the results indicates that something underlying may be true. The question then is what to do with these results? If a specific race has a lower IQ, for instance, what do we do next, how do we approach reflection, and how do we carry it out afterwards? What it means for a society to have a high rate of high IQ? Because that type of thinking leads to the reinforcement of the desire for social engineering, e.g. raising a population’s IQ. The limited intelligence will conclude to a superior/inferior dynamic, right of the bat. Can a reasoning be crafted to be more sophisticated? As a fucked up species, is it even possible? How love for our human fellows can be introduce in that type of research? Not the « I love you because you will let me change you to look more like me », but a real social aspiration to uplift our humanity.
If I were you, the lesson that I would take from this experience is that you will be targeted for such dirty tricks despite your having avoided the most pertinent HBD question of all, which is: Is the frequency of sociopathic behavior higher among the Ashkenazim than among other ethnic groups? Therefore, you might as well address that question experimentally yourselves. Given the mass murder of Gazans and Lebanese, and the risk of a global economic collapse because of Israeli attacks on Iran, the question hardly seems irrelevant.
Most HBD researchers have positive opinions of Jews, and there's no real quantitative evidence regarding sociopathy. Quantitative evidence shows Ashkenazi are higher in depression, anxiety, eating disorder, but lower in alcoholism. Fits my stereotype, I don't know any Jewish heavy drinkers, whereas I only know a few Russians and half of them are alcoholics.
Thank you for responding. I respect that. I believe that there is evidence that Jews are overrepresented as white-collar criminals, but I can't cite it now. Several aspects of history suggest a higher frequency of sociopathy: the expulsions from many polities, the prominence in Bolshevik atrocities, Zionism as a new flowering of settler-colonialism just when the Western countries were renouncing their colonialism, assassination as a State policy, Moshe Dayan's dictum that "Israel must be like a mad dog, too vicious to bother." And there is a plausible argument to be made for natural and sexual selection in favor of increased sociopathy during the Arenda period, when the Ashkenazi population grew much more rapidly than the Slavic host population did, suggesting highly effective extraction of kopeks and zloties from the Slavic peasantry.
I had relationships with four young Jewish women that were of the friends-with-benefits sort. Two of the women were emotionally unstable, one was sociopathic, and one seemed normal by heritage-American standards. I did not encounter a female sociopath among a dozen heritage-American and Brazilian lady friends. During the same period, I had two separate casual disagreements with young Jewish men who were eager to escalate to fist fights, as judged by their holding a closed hand in front of my nose. Later in life, I had much more consequential disagreements with rural southern Americans who were tough as nails but very cautious about escalating a disagreement (an honor culture in operation). I believe that rapid escalation to physical force would be found to be a correlate of sociopathy in psychological experiments.
My claim is that investigation of ethnic differences in sociopathy is the ultimate HBD taboo, the final frontier so to speak. And that the taboo is strong because research results would have political ramifications in Europe and North America.
As I said, no real quantitative evidence. It's very hard to study because crime data is relatively rare, and Jews are a tiny proportion of the population, so it is difficult to find a dataset with enough Jews and a crime variable.
Hello fellow HBDers. Now that you are in a bit of a spot, why don't you crash your whole organization to pursue my ethnic vendettas that have been proposed literally thousands of times by now as the masterkey to saving western civilization and never worked once? Beware Jewish entryism.
Emil, I commend you, there are few people in the field with more courage and depth of knowledge than you!
For those who wish to know more about Shukman’s reprehensible nature:
https://open.substack.com/pub/edwarddutton/p/revealed-the-spy-who-hates-us?r=1f3ulj&utm_medium=ios
Bravo -
From an "oppressed" tri-racial Hispanic.
Thank goodness my moral superiors are looking out for me via censorship, and vilifying science.
Here in the USA, because as a Hispanic, I'm too stupid to obtain the same Photo ID required to enter the 2024 DNC convention, thankfully no voter ID is required in many Democratic Party run states.
Ah, as a Hispanic, I'm also too shiftless, lazy, and financially irresponsible to save $30 USD once every 10 years to pay for a U.S. Passport Card. A Photo ID recognized across the USA.
The good news is that, AFAICT, the US election (and perhaps the UK budget) sucked almost all the attention away from this story. There seem to be very few other outlets reporting it according to Google, although the wikipedia page is the most visible hit
the avoidance of certain topic in science will always be with us I assume. bec it is not whether "they" disagree with doing the research (really), but "they" are very afraid of what that science may find. a little awkward to have to say "ok. darker skinned populations are x standard deviations less intelligent that lighter skinned populations. now what?" they actually strongly suspect the answers to these questions.
Honestly enjoyed learning about the HDF from the HNH articles. Whitepilling.
Great summary of the situation, legacy media is dying in front of our eyes.
"I am hopeful this story will help encourage other funders to donate to this worthy cause."
I am, too; it is a very worthy cause.
Legacy media is seriously struggling, seems they're reaching out to try to grab views and such
Folks like you are the true heirs to the dissident philosophers and proto-scientists upon whose shoulders we stand today. Gremlins like Harry Shukman and The Guardian trace their lineage back to medieval church inquisitors and witch-hunters.
I disagree I don't think the medieval church is bad as people claim I've studied them on in scholarship of it only about 4 to 10,000 people actually died by Inquisition and the actual death toll of the witch hunts was 50,000 and the Catholic church was pretty skeptical about which is existence saying that before the 14th century most the church scoundrel said they didn't exist or were just eluded women and yeah the church did preserve signs the Galileo fair is complicated because he couldn't prove a star parallax he Earth to move and the vision of Jupiter really didn't prove it because the tectonic system was around the idea that planets move around the Earth and the Earth doesn't move was the line with the best evidence at the time a better analogy with the left anti-science would be like Lysenkoism denying the fact that plants actually compete and that thinking led to the deaths about 7 million ukrainians in the name of equality of course how many atrocities has committed in that name is unknown
I am very open to your research, but the fear of the results indicates that something underlying may be true. The question then is what to do with these results? If a specific race has a lower IQ, for instance, what do we do next, how do we approach reflection, and how do we carry it out afterwards? What it means for a society to have a high rate of high IQ? Because that type of thinking leads to the reinforcement of the desire for social engineering, e.g. raising a population’s IQ. The limited intelligence will conclude to a superior/inferior dynamic, right of the bat. Can a reasoning be crafted to be more sophisticated? As a fucked up species, is it even possible? How love for our human fellows can be introduce in that type of research? Not the « I love you because you will let me change you to look more like me », but a real social aspiration to uplift our humanity.
If it is correct that one race has lower IQ and other abilities, it would be wise to not have woke policies to create "equity", for starters.
If I were you, the lesson that I would take from this experience is that you will be targeted for such dirty tricks despite your having avoided the most pertinent HBD question of all, which is: Is the frequency of sociopathic behavior higher among the Ashkenazim than among other ethnic groups? Therefore, you might as well address that question experimentally yourselves. Given the mass murder of Gazans and Lebanese, and the risk of a global economic collapse because of Israeli attacks on Iran, the question hardly seems irrelevant.
Most HBD researchers have positive opinions of Jews, and there's no real quantitative evidence regarding sociopathy. Quantitative evidence shows Ashkenazi are higher in depression, anxiety, eating disorder, but lower in alcoholism. Fits my stereotype, I don't know any Jewish heavy drinkers, whereas I only know a few Russians and half of them are alcoholics.
Thank you for responding. I respect that. I believe that there is evidence that Jews are overrepresented as white-collar criminals, but I can't cite it now. Several aspects of history suggest a higher frequency of sociopathy: the expulsions from many polities, the prominence in Bolshevik atrocities, Zionism as a new flowering of settler-colonialism just when the Western countries were renouncing their colonialism, assassination as a State policy, Moshe Dayan's dictum that "Israel must be like a mad dog, too vicious to bother." And there is a plausible argument to be made for natural and sexual selection in favor of increased sociopathy during the Arenda period, when the Ashkenazi population grew much more rapidly than the Slavic host population did, suggesting highly effective extraction of kopeks and zloties from the Slavic peasantry.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/arenda-jewish-virtual-library#google_vignette
I had relationships with four young Jewish women that were of the friends-with-benefits sort. Two of the women were emotionally unstable, one was sociopathic, and one seemed normal by heritage-American standards. I did not encounter a female sociopath among a dozen heritage-American and Brazilian lady friends. During the same period, I had two separate casual disagreements with young Jewish men who were eager to escalate to fist fights, as judged by their holding a closed hand in front of my nose. Later in life, I had much more consequential disagreements with rural southern Americans who were tough as nails but very cautious about escalating a disagreement (an honor culture in operation). I believe that rapid escalation to physical force would be found to be a correlate of sociopathy in psychological experiments.
My claim is that investigation of ethnic differences in sociopathy is the ultimate HBD taboo, the final frontier so to speak. And that the taboo is strong because research results would have political ramifications in Europe and North America.
As I said, no real quantitative evidence. It's very hard to study because crime data is relatively rare, and Jews are a tiny proportion of the population, so it is difficult to find a dataset with enough Jews and a crime variable.
Yes, the famous stereotype of the Ashkenazi Jew always getting into fistfights. Nailed it.
Hello fellow HBDers. Now that you are in a bit of a spot, why don't you crash your whole organization to pursue my ethnic vendettas that have been proposed literally thousands of times by now as the masterkey to saving western civilization and never worked once? Beware Jewish entryism.
Hyper-verbalism unrestrained by spatial reasoning generates drivel.