Just Emil Kirkegaard Things

Share this post

The Present Progressive and “to see” etc.

www.emilkirkegaard.com

The Present Progressive and “to see” etc.

Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
Sep 27, 2009
Share
Share this post

The Present Progressive and “to see” etc.

www.emilkirkegaard.com

In Longman's texts Talking about the present, and Talking about the Past it is claimed that some verbs cannot be used in the present and past progressive. But they can. Here is the list of verbs it is calimed that cannot be used: (to) be, have, see, believe, like, agree, know, love, disagree, recognize, hate, mean, remember, prefer, need, understand, want, deserve, wish, belong.

Now consider these commonly used sentences:

E1. She is seeing another man.

E2. She saw another man.

Clearly then the verb “see” can be used both in the present and the past tense.

Consider these sentences:

E3. I am standing here and agreeing with you, but then you give me that. That was uncalled for.

E4. I was standing here and agreeing with you, but then you give me that. That was uncalled for.

It seems to me that there is nothing wrong with these sentences. So the verb “agree” can be used both in the past and in the present.

Consider these sentences:

E5. I am being very nice to you.

E6. I was being very nice to you.

Again nothing seems to be wrong with these sentences. Sentences like (E5) and (E6) seem to be used to stress the act of being nice to someone. Perhaps someone who denies it is the case.

I'm undecided as to which of the other verbs mentioned that cannot be used in the progressive form.

Share
Share this post

The Present Progressive and “to see” etc.

www.emilkirkegaard.com
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing