Just Emil Kirkegaard Things
Subscribe
Sign in
Share this discussion
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and shouldn't be used
www.emilkirkegaard.com
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Note
Other
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and…
Emil O. W. Kirkegaard
Aug 15, 2022
5
Share this post
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and shouldn't be used
www.emilkirkegaard.com
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Note
Other
How often have you seen 4 samples finding standard deviations of 35 for IQ??
Read →
0 Comments
Share
Share
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Note
Other
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please
turn on JavaScript
or unblock scripts
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and shouldn't be used
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and…
Buj (1981) is probably fraudulent and shouldn't be used
How often have you seen 4 samples finding standard deviations of 35 for IQ??