A more realistic estimate is 10-15 IQ
A better way to estimate iq is to use percentiles: In a group of 100 random persons, how many of them are you smarter than?
This, but also find benchmark tasks of each IQ level ala NALS and PIAAC (see previous posts).
Jesus. How does this pass peer review? It took you, what, all of 2 minutes to see their flawed methodology?
Peer review is largely random and with a left-leaning bias. This paper isn't political, so it comes down to just the random luck part I think. I know one of the authors, he's a nice guy, and has some other good work.
Also the metropolitan vs national average as the anchor is also concerning.
A better way to estimate iq is to use percentiles: In a group of 100 random persons, how many of them are you smarter than?
This, but also find benchmark tasks of each IQ level ala NALS and PIAAC (see previous posts).
Jesus. How does this pass peer review? It took you, what, all of 2 minutes to see their flawed methodology?
Peer review is largely random and with a left-leaning bias. This paper isn't political, so it comes down to just the random luck part I think. I know one of the authors, he's a nice guy, and has some other good work.
Also the metropolitan vs national average as the anchor is also concerning.