Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris67's avatar

Probably better to do the residual for log(population) ~ log(nature index count), to adjust for population effects(as you used before in your paper on national mental sports performance and national IQ). The correlation seems to have increased in recent years(0.85 in 2022 nature index). Might also be intriguing to try factor analysis with the different subjects some subjects of study are surely more important for overall innovation that others, as your comment on the vatican city implied). Is the full country dataset for the nature index publically available for all years(only seem to see top 50 on the website for previous years)? Also USA was one of the top countries, so despite recent brain drain/immigrant selection from other countries presumably inflating these figures, americans seem to be pretty innovative(aligns with other results from PISA/PIAAC/TIMMS showing that when race/ethnicity is taken into account americans exceed most other countries(east asian americans exceed japan/korea/taiwan), white americans exceed most european ones(yes even when 1st/2nd gen immigrants are excluded).

Expand full comment
Brettbaker's avatar

Yes, the US has reduced scientific research as a percentage of GDP. And of the money spent, an increasing amount is wasted on soft science projects of increasingly dubious worth.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts