19 Comments
User's avatar
Brandy's avatar

These people disgust me. Anything that doesn't sit well in their authoritarian delusional religion is just too much for them to comprehend. If we don't study, find, and acknowledge the truth, we can't come up with solutions. This means we will stay stuck. Scientific compilation and study of data is the only real way to know the truth as it is and not how we would like it to be. I'll donate.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 16, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Brandy's avatar

RationalWiki is an online wiki which is written from a skeptical, secular, and progressivist perspective.

Also, I'm not a progressive and don't need my facts to be written from a certain perspective to satisfy the truth. The truth itself doesn't need a slant.

Expand full comment
Brandy's avatar

No, that actually disgusts me, too.

Expand full comment
Spencer's avatar

Red fascism marches on.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 15, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Inconvenient Truth's avatar

LOL! The "rational"wiki article you cite reads like a parody account of the modern left's science denialism.

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

Did you create this account just to make these comments? That sorta confirms everything Emil said.

Expand full comment
Compsci's avatar

One might reconsider rationalwiki as a source for anything. I stopped reading when they called Quillette a “right wing” publication. Seems these days, anything not hard Left, is Right.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 16, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Compsci's avatar

And “mediabiasfactcheck” is who? Most all these fact checkers *are* Leftist disinformation and little more than paid for hacks—for example SPLC. However, I never said that Quillette was not a conservative outlet, only that it was not “right-wing” in the slur sense. This slur sentiment is illustrated in your comment “conservative talking points”—as if that means anything. I assume you would only allow/approve commentary that expresses your “view” point juxtaposed to “right-wing” viewpoints. It really doesn’t work that way, and hasn’t for quite a while.

I’ve read Quillette and in a couple of cases was in the know wrt topics. They we spot on in their analysis. “Balanced” is not the point, accuracy and truthfulness is.

Expand full comment
Ben Norton's avatar

Ok, so you're a nutjob. any source that disagrees with your BS is "leftist disinformation".

Expand full comment
Compsci's avatar

Nope, I just pointed out the irony of Leftist’s who call the “kettle black”.

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

Did you create this account just to make these comments? That sorta confirms everything Emil said.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 16, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

Attack of the Killer Anons. lol As if people that read EK are going to be influenced by such infantile tricks. The Cancel machine really is a headless beast. Your tactics must be venue specific you simpleton(s).

And the ratwiki, like most rat wikis, is just a collection of slurs and information used for doxxing and to coordinate cancel attacks. Shouldn't something called 'rationalist' focus less on unsupported slandal and personal information?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 16, 2023
Expand full comment