A nice improvement, the next path forward and reliability issues
Very helpful. Thanks for providing.
> Nevertheless, it sets a new minimum value that Gusev et al can have fun explaining away.
I was also quite curious how Sasha would respond to this. The answer is in a comment, and it is overall a good answer IMO (apart from the 1-dimensional claim)—& I have developed a similar method as the Spearman correction that further generalizes to other scenarios: https://theinfinitesimal.substack.com/p/the-missing-heritability-question/comment/180857849.
For me, at least, I’ll default to Sasha’s explanation until this particular question has a more direct study to measure it
Very interesting. The missing hereditability concept is exciting! By the way, what did Gusev et al opine on IQ heridability?
Very helpful. Thanks for providing.
> Nevertheless, it sets a new minimum value that Gusev et al can have fun explaining away.
I was also quite curious how Sasha would respond to this. The answer is in a comment, and it is overall a good answer IMO (apart from the 1-dimensional claim)—& I have developed a similar method as the Spearman correction that further generalizes to other scenarios: https://theinfinitesimal.substack.com/p/the-missing-heritability-question/comment/180857849.
For me, at least, I’ll default to Sasha’s explanation until this particular question has a more direct study to measure it
Very interesting. The missing hereditability concept is exciting! By the way, what did Gusev et al opine on IQ heridability?