The fact that these scandals have had such little political impact truly demonstrates how abjectly lost England is. If this isn't enough to prompt radical political action on a meaningful scale, it's hard to imagine what could be.
Policing racism amongst bad white people is clearly a much higher priority for the ruling class than preventing little girls from being turned into junkie rape toys. After all, diversity is our future, and our children have been slated for gender-affirming castration in any case.
We see this bias in its most naked form in ChatGPT, which said the quiet part out loud when it declared that it was better that millions die in nuclear fire than that a single person even think for a moment of whispering the n-bomb.
The ruling class has entirely lost the mandate of heaven.
In the US and Canada Pakistani groomer gangs might not be present due to highly selective immigration from South Asia. Various refugee groups might be an issue though, like Somalis, Afghanis, Iraqis etc.
This is horrendous! When are we, and by we, I mean the Western culture originality going to stand up? It's obvious we are being taken over by immigrants in the US and the UK? Why don't we have the power to stop this? Why won't we fight for the women and children?
I don't think anything could really shake European men out of their slumber. After all, we already have massive welfare dependency, 10x murder rates from certain rapes, groomer gangs with thousands of victims for decades, periodic uncontrolled borders with refugees welcome, lack of expulsion even for career criminals, and replacement migration. Despite this, we have 4+ decades of political inaction and half-action. 🤷
As it gets increasingly worse, though, more and more of the European elite and elite-adjacent middle and upper class will be affected by these problems, so their implicit interests towards their family and ethnicity will become more powerful and ethnocentrism in general might increase across Europe. This is speculation, of course. The reality is black-pilling, but the cognitive elite haven't yet suffered the consequences of their own beliefs and enacted policies. If they will, and if the native populations at large will become increasingly hostile to the native elite, then we might see some change in the form of peaceful secession or civil war resulting in some form of separation. I wouldn't bet on it, though, since there are so many factors at play here.
Europe is over 90% White and they are fighting the invasion. US 58% white AND HAVE DONE NOTHING. I am sick of big mouth yahoos talking shit about Europe when the US is ten times worse
US was over 80% white in the early 80's until reagan allowed non whites to over run whites just like he did in california. what I mean is as the % of whites goes down so does the country.
"We have to remember that our defense is not just a commitment of money, it is a commitment of will. Because as the Polish experience reminds us, the defense of the West ultimately rests not only on means but also on the will of its people to prevail and be successful and get what you have to have. The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive. Do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any cost? Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?"
The UK is lost already. They do not have the will to survive and defend the very culture and civilization that created them. Much of Europe is the same way. Only Poland/Hungary/Czechia seem willing to defend their country and culture.
Middle Eastern-South Asian men do have a proclivity towards sexual fantasies and less of an inhibitionary (https://youtu.be/kA4ig-WHGeI?t=6) response than other groups, though such inclinations also exist in Korea/Japan with toned down violence.
Wealthy billionaires might also be overrepresented in stealth sex ring crimes (some of the women become executives of foundations). I'd say all men have a strong preference for post-puberty adolescent females (if the floor was allowable below 20 when answering surveys).
It's likely a strategy done by low-status males (when out in the open) which has been proven successful in their historical ancestral environments with no developed state with strong enforcement norms which can only be developed from high-trust societies (a byproduct of repeated selection from removal of anti-social traits on a homogenous population or successive outbreeding with social contract norms and no fertility pills). Even men in the military usually visit red light districts or have brothels set up near-by to deal with their sexual frustrations.
The number one indicator of civil warfare and nation conflict if I recall from the World Bank statistics was something like sexually frustrated men not being able to have a woman and also joining status-gangs to blow up people/murder people/etc, but are pacified by matchmaking services when given a woman or two to marry (at least in the Middle East/South Asia).
Without the development of advanced cognition and putting energy into capital-intensive efforts which require long-scale coordinated efforts, there can be no development of secure institutions or traditions. Advanced cognition is costly and energetically intensive. Selectivity (via sexual selection) is an energetically intensive process which can only be mediated by social norms with status cues, status-games, differential aptitudes. If they are just consistently inbreeding, then there is no possibility for directional selection towards more civilizational-traits. I suppose they are 500+ years behind on the evolutionary time-scale for non-incest laws.
Unfortunately, nowhere will be safe that is economically developed because those are where the migrants are most imported to. The disposition of politics at the moment is to collapse the countries internally through ethnic strife, economic stagnation and infrastructure decay for a mish-max policy of accelerated de-industrialization beyond urban cities, mongrelization of races (in the name of collective unity), anti-political unity (no elite disparaging with a pluralistic society), population control (whomever dies doesn't matter, wealthy people can move anywhere with gates/armed police) and justification for centralization of force/adfvancement of biosecurity state (interests in stratification and genotyping behaviours of the populace) if riots ever were to happen, and de-regionalization/zonification (creation of pseudo-zones of aggregated blocks of people to force people to emigrate/migrate just like present-day Ukraine) for purposes of (intended) re-development thereafter, especially when the land becomes cheap and AI drones can be deployed en masse.
Also, there is some economic selection in Canada to an extent (I've been seeing more migrants in the lesser-populated areas), so these effects may be attenuated.
The byline is rather silly. If you are middle-class two-parent family in the UK, the chance of your daughter being trafficked by P***s is lightning-strike range. Even a functional working-class two-parent family in a city with a large P*** population where neither parent is on drugs is safe. That's one of the important reasons the issue has not had and will not have a major political impact.
the author says move away from the street shitting hindus. that doesnt fix nothing. white men by the tens of thousands have to get together march thru the pakis area root them out savagely beat them where they cant walk. burn their houses
The fact that these scandals have had such little political impact truly demonstrates how abjectly lost England is. If this isn't enough to prompt radical political action on a meaningful scale, it's hard to imagine what could be.
Policing racism amongst bad white people is clearly a much higher priority for the ruling class than preventing little girls from being turned into junkie rape toys. After all, diversity is our future, and our children have been slated for gender-affirming castration in any case.
We see this bias in its most naked form in ChatGPT, which said the quiet part out loud when it declared that it was better that millions die in nuclear fire than that a single person even think for a moment of whispering the n-bomb.
The ruling class has entirely lost the mandate of heaven.
In the US and Canada Pakistani groomer gangs might not be present due to highly selective immigration from South Asia. Various refugee groups might be an issue though, like Somalis, Afghanis, Iraqis etc.
This is horrendous! When are we, and by we, I mean the Western culture originality going to stand up? It's obvious we are being taken over by immigrants in the US and the UK? Why don't we have the power to stop this? Why won't we fight for the women and children?
I don't think anything could really shake European men out of their slumber. After all, we already have massive welfare dependency, 10x murder rates from certain rapes, groomer gangs with thousands of victims for decades, periodic uncontrolled borders with refugees welcome, lack of expulsion even for career criminals, and replacement migration. Despite this, we have 4+ decades of political inaction and half-action. 🤷
As it gets increasingly worse, though, more and more of the European elite and elite-adjacent middle and upper class will be affected by these problems, so their implicit interests towards their family and ethnicity will become more powerful and ethnocentrism in general might increase across Europe. This is speculation, of course. The reality is black-pilling, but the cognitive elite haven't yet suffered the consequences of their own beliefs and enacted policies. If they will, and if the native populations at large will become increasingly hostile to the native elite, then we might see some change in the form of peaceful secession or civil war resulting in some form of separation. I wouldn't bet on it, though, since there are so many factors at play here.
Europe is over 90% White and they are fighting the invasion. US 58% white AND HAVE DONE NOTHING. I am sick of big mouth yahoos talking shit about Europe when the US is ten times worse
US was 90% White in 1920 too, so was Argentina at some point. Even South Africa was mostly White once. Once.
South Africa was never white majority. White percentage of total pop is %23 in 1911 census. Whites made up %19 of pop in 1960 census.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_South_Africans
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_South_Africa
.
US was over 80% white in the early 80's until reagan allowed non whites to over run whites just like he did in california. what I mean is as the % of whites goes down so does the country.
President Trump gave his best speech in Poland in 2017 on this topic.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-people-poland/
"We have to remember that our defense is not just a commitment of money, it is a commitment of will. Because as the Polish experience reminds us, the defense of the West ultimately rests not only on means but also on the will of its people to prevail and be successful and get what you have to have. The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive. Do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any cost? Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?"
The UK is lost already. They do not have the will to survive and defend the very culture and civilization that created them. Much of Europe is the same way. Only Poland/Hungary/Czechia seem willing to defend their country and culture.
US is just as bad as great shitain
Middle Eastern-South Asian men do have a proclivity towards sexual fantasies and less of an inhibitionary (https://youtu.be/kA4ig-WHGeI?t=6) response than other groups, though such inclinations also exist in Korea/Japan with toned down violence.
Wealthy billionaires might also be overrepresented in stealth sex ring crimes (some of the women become executives of foundations). I'd say all men have a strong preference for post-puberty adolescent females (if the floor was allowable below 20 when answering surveys).
It's likely a strategy done by low-status males (when out in the open) which has been proven successful in their historical ancestral environments with no developed state with strong enforcement norms which can only be developed from high-trust societies (a byproduct of repeated selection from removal of anti-social traits on a homogenous population or successive outbreeding with social contract norms and no fertility pills). Even men in the military usually visit red light districts or have brothels set up near-by to deal with their sexual frustrations.
The number one indicator of civil warfare and nation conflict if I recall from the World Bank statistics was something like sexually frustrated men not being able to have a woman and also joining status-gangs to blow up people/murder people/etc, but are pacified by matchmaking services when given a woman or two to marry (at least in the Middle East/South Asia).
Without the development of advanced cognition and putting energy into capital-intensive efforts which require long-scale coordinated efforts, there can be no development of secure institutions or traditions. Advanced cognition is costly and energetically intensive. Selectivity (via sexual selection) is an energetically intensive process which can only be mediated by social norms with status cues, status-games, differential aptitudes. If they are just consistently inbreeding, then there is no possibility for directional selection towards more civilizational-traits. I suppose they are 500+ years behind on the evolutionary time-scale for non-incest laws.
Unfortunately, nowhere will be safe that is economically developed because those are where the migrants are most imported to. The disposition of politics at the moment is to collapse the countries internally through ethnic strife, economic stagnation and infrastructure decay for a mish-max policy of accelerated de-industrialization beyond urban cities, mongrelization of races (in the name of collective unity), anti-political unity (no elite disparaging with a pluralistic society), population control (whomever dies doesn't matter, wealthy people can move anywhere with gates/armed police) and justification for centralization of force/adfvancement of biosecurity state (interests in stratification and genotyping behaviours of the populace) if riots ever were to happen, and de-regionalization/zonification (creation of pseudo-zones of aggregated blocks of people to force people to emigrate/migrate just like present-day Ukraine) for purposes of (intended) re-development thereafter, especially when the land becomes cheap and AI drones can be deployed en masse.
Also, there is some economic selection in Canada to an extent (I've been seeing more migrants in the lesser-populated areas), so these effects may be attenuated.
The byline is rather silly. If you are middle-class two-parent family in the UK, the chance of your daughter being trafficked by P***s is lightning-strike range. Even a functional working-class two-parent family in a city with a large P*** population where neither parent is on drugs is safe. That's one of the important reasons the issue has not had and will not have a major political impact.
Where are the real men in England if the cops won't protect young white girls maybe their fathers should get involved unless you are afraid
England has ridiculously strict laws on gun ownership.
either your daughter turns into a boy or becomes a drug addicted gang bang hooker. this is life under bolshevik jew rule
the author says move away from the street shitting hindus. that doesnt fix nothing. white men by the tens of thousands have to get together march thru the pakis area root them out savagely beat them where they cant walk. burn their houses